Boston Hip Replacement Lawsuit

On television, you often see tort lawyers advertising, sometimes mentioning significant jury verdicts and settlements in the millions. This can create an impression that similar outcomes are easily attainable.

However, the reality can be different.

If you’ve suffered due to a hip replacement, especially if it involves defective hip implants like the LFit V40 femoral head or metal hip implants, you might be eligible to file a Boston hip replacement lawsuit. The specific nature of your hip implant case, including factors like medical complications or device failure, plays a crucial role in court representation.

Our Boston law firm is adept at handling a variety of cases, particularly those categorized as mass torts. These often pertain to drugs, medical devices, and pollution, frequently involving multiple lawsuits or multidistrict litigation due to the collective impact on numerous individuals. Mass tort cases in our practice often include issues like defective hip replacements or serious complications arising from hip surgery.

To initiate a lawsuit in these areas, concrete evidence of injury is essential. Simply using a product doesn’t entitle someone to compensation; it’s crucial to demonstrate tangible harm and establish a direct link to the defendant’s actions or negligence. This is particularly pertinent in cases involving medical devices like hip implants, where the defective design or manufacturing can lead to severe complications, necessitating revision surgery.

In recent years, we’ve seen an increase in lawsuits related to hip replacement surgeries. Many of these cases involve defective hip replacement devices, leading to significant distress and pain for the recipients.

If you’ve encountered issues with a hip replacement, such as early aseptic loosening or metal poisoning, consulting with our experienced Boston class-action lawyers can help you understand your rights and potential for a claim. They can provide a thorough initial consultation to assess the merits of your case, especially if it involves widely recognized issues like the Rejuvenate and ABG II systems or other problematic hip systems.

Table of Contents

Why Do People File Lawsuits For Hip Replacements?

Annually, thousands undergo hip replacement surgery, a number that increases as the population ages. These surgeries are generally routine, employing similar techniques and materials across various medical centers.

Commonly used materials in these surgeries include metal, plastic, and ceramic components, often part of comprehensive hip systems like the ASR Hip Resurfacing System or the DePuy Pinnacle System.

Manufacturers like Wright Medical and DePuy Orthopaedics Inc. are notable for producing hip replacement devices, including hip implants and prostheses. Over the past decade, there has been a surge in hip replacement lawsuits, primarily due to defective hip implants and serious complications arising from these medical devices.

When hip implants fail, often due to issues like early aseptic loosening or metal sensitivity, it leads to a significant number of lawsuits against these companies.

During a hip replacement procedure, surgeons must securely anchor the new hip. While plastic fasteners are common, the use of metal-on-metal hip implants has gained popularity due to their durability.

Products like the LFIT V40 Femoral Head or the Stryker Rejuvenate and ABG II hip systems exemplify this trend. However, durability concerns remain, as some metal hip implants have led to severe complications, necessitating revision surgery.

Unfortunately, when these implants fail prematurely, a second hip replacement surgery becomes necessary. This revision surgery, often more complex than the initial hip replacement, involves removing the failed implant and replacing it with a new one.

The process can be invasive and painful, leading to increased medical expenses and sometimes prompting additional legal action, as seen in various hip replacement MDL (multidistrict litigation) cases.

What Companies Have Hip Replacement Lawsuits Pending?

Each year, numerous defective hip replacement implants, such as the Wright Medical hip implant, the DePuy ASR Hip Resurfacing System, and others, enter the market, raising serious concerns about the suffering caused by these defective components. The prevalence of defective hip replacements has led to a multitude of hip replacement lawsuits and legal actions across the country, with some major cases involving well-known manufacturers:


The M2a Magnum hip implant by Biomet, initially FDA-approved, later revealed significant flaws. Promised to last 15 years, it began malfunctioning within just a year or two post-surgery, contrary to the claims of durability. This has resulted in multiple lawsuits and substantial settlement fees since 2012, reflecting the broader issue of defective hip implant cases.


Stryker, facing serious complications from their products like Rejuvenate and ABG II, eventually recalled its hip implants. This action, however, came after numerous patients had already been affected, leading to multijurisdictional litigation, particularly in New Jersey. The company faces the prospect of paying out millions in settlements due to defective hip replacements.

An x-ray of a person's leg showing hip inflammation.

Smith and Nephew

Their hip implants, including the Birmingham Hip Resurfacing system, were initially seen as effective but turned out to have severe issues. A significant percentage of patients needed revision surgery within a few years of implantation. Although many lawsuits have been settled, numerous cases are still pending, reflecting ongoing concerns about defective hip implant products.

Johnson & Johnson

Among the companies facing hip replacement lawsuits, Johnson & Johnson might incur the highest costs, primarily due to the scale of their operations and the number of hip replacements they’ve produced. With over $2 billion in settlements paid out since 2013, and many more cases pending, the financial impact on the company is substantial.

The costs for these businesses, including legal fees and settlements, run into millions. Mass tort lawyers are relentless in their pursuit of justice and compensation for clients affected by defective hip systems, such as the LFIT V40 Femoral Head or metal hip implants, regardless of the size or reputation of the manufacturing companies.

Is There a Statute of Limitations for Filing a Boston Hip Replacement Lawsuit?

People often inquire about the timeframe for filing a hip replacement lawsuit in Boston, MA. The time allowed depends on several factors, including the date you first discovered your injury. This is particularly relevant in cases involving defective hip implants like the Stryker Rejuvenate and ABG II systems or the LFIT V40 Femoral Head.

In many instances, complications from hip replacement surgeries, such as metal poisoning or severe complications, become apparent a few years after the initial implant surgery. Patients may start experiencing discomfort or pain, indicative of a potential defect in the hip implant.

Upon experiencing these symptoms, medical professionals often conduct thorough tests, such as checking for metal sensitivity or other serious complications, to determine the root cause. In cases where a defective hip replacement device is identified, a revision surgery might be recommended to replace the malfunctioning component.

The statute of limitations on this topic is very clear:

You have a total of three years from the date you discovered your injury to file a lawsuit. It’s crucial not to delay beyond this period in seeking legal advice.

Therefore, if you suspect you’ve been harmed by a defective hip implant, arranging an initial consultation with our Boston mass tort law firm should be a priority. During this consultation, you’ll have the opportunity to discuss the specifics of your case, including any issues related to hip implant products, serious medical complications, or potential involvement in multidistrict litigation.

Furthermore, our law firm offers a free initial consultation, and our payment structure is contingent on winning your case. This means you won’t incur any fees unless we successfully secure compensation for you.